Although not, the fresh new thus-called “Swedish model” deliberately excludes men sex pros, plus today their exposure are barely thought

Due to the fact Zelizer cards, taboos exists up against sex to own get

Sweden, located in northern European countries, hosts 10 mil people, therefore it is by far the most populated country inside Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and you may Sweden) as well as in this new European Nordic Part (Scandinavia together with Finland and you will Iceland). Originating in the latest later 1990’s, Sweden became the worldwide leader regarding the fight against prostitution, making the country preferred throughout the literary works and you may discussion about sex really works.

In this section, We explain how the Swedish design keeps diffused across the globe. We explain the legislation (which is now two decades dated) additionally the feminist thought that served the first statutes. However summarize the 3 decades ot fieldwork that i transmitted in Sweden. step 1 questioned twelve key informants (societal gurus, activists, a counselor, and you will a good sexologist) in 2 of the around three biggest Swedish places (Stockholm and you can Malmo), and in Oslo (Norway) and Helsinki (Finland) to compare other countries and expertise. The end summarizes part of the overall performance ot my search.

It is important to understand the environment in Sweden with respect to research on pros- titution/sex works. This issue is so sensitive that it seems impossible for the average person to have a neutral approach to it. Everyone must stand in favor of or against the legislation. And the words used to frame the discussions matter a great deal. The Swedish law uses the terms prostitution and prostitute, not sex work and sex employee. The government and those who support the legislation use the word prostitution, while those who wish to overturn the legislation use the term sex worker. For example, Swedish government institutions, such as local authorities and health services providers, use the word prostitution, but the two Swedish associations that fight tor the rights of the country’s sex workers (Fuckforbundet and Rose Alliance; see Figures 31.1 and 31.2) use the term sex performs. 1 learned from my fieldwork that using the correct words with the people who live and work in Sweden is important. Indeed, some social workers or activists refused to talk with me because 1 used the “wrong” word with them; because the legislation is so controversial, few people believe that you are a neutral researcher who wants to study prostitution or sex work from an academic point of view. Attempting to

Profile 30.1 People who have purple umbrellas (a symbol of the new sex workers’ rights movement) to the Fuckforbundet drifts during the EuroPride Parade inside the Stockholm to the .

Understand the effects of your Swedish statutes toward lives and on the job from male sex workers, step one interviewed 25 male sex pros who work when you look at the Sweden

be as neutral as possible, some researchers and social workers have used the term sex for compensation. Unfortunately, the phrase just sounds awkward to those who hear it and who want to know your position on the issue.

To maintain a neutral position, in this chapter 1 use both terms, in alphabetical order with a slash in between: prostitution /sex works or prostitute/sex staff. Before exploring the details of the Swedish legislation, it is important to understand the feminists thought that has framed the prostitution/sex work debate.

Shape 30.2 Brand new Fuckforbundet drifts from a street-height view when you look at the EuroPride Procession inside the Stockholm toward . Sex workers and allies towards drifts monitor its assistance to own sex workers’ liberties when you look at the Sweden.

Due to space limitations, I offer two key elements of the debate: the different ideas regarding prostitution/sex work (as presented by Zelizer, 2005) and feminist thought on this topic (Scou- lar, 2004). The aim of Zelizer s book, The acquisition of Closeness, is to analyze “the relationship between everyday practices and legal disputes when it comes to intimate economic interactions” (p. 1). It is commonly believed that “intimacy corrupts economy and the economy corrupts intimacy. Yet . . . people often mingle economic activity with intimacy. The two often sustain each other” (p. 1).